deviant art

Deviant Login
Buy ArtBuy T-Shirts & Gear Buy adCast Buy Premium Membership
Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
  • Photo
Browse More Like This
Download Image
JPG, 570×757 more ▶

More from `IllustratedEye

Featured in Groups:

Not currently featured in any groups.

Details

November 3, 2002
287 KB
570×757
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 98
Favourites: 162 [who?]


Views: 10,974 (0 today)
Downloads: 2,415 (0 today)
[x]
:iconillustratedeye:
For those wondering... This is the piece I got the violation for. For the small area behind the black box. So I figure why not continue the statement and put a censored tag

Nope... you can't get it without the black box Or that'd be a violation. Push the boundaries... THAT'S what art is. One's self expression and experiment.

Edit 11/20/07
funny how things change- now there's nakid gals all over DA. When this was first posted they were rare and in some cases a violation
Add a Comment:
 
Preview   Add Comment
:iconsliverpyro:
~sliverpyro Nov 22, 2010   Traditional Artist
which of your models is this anyway??
Reply
:iconillustratedeye:
`IllustratedEye Nov 22, 2010  Professional Photographer
this was Jamie
Reply
:iconcanadianboys:
~canadianboys Oct 14, 2010   Filmographer
wats under the censor
Reply
:iconlordbozso:
!lordbozso May 22, 2009   Interface Designer
niiiiiice
Reply
:iconlordkitsumaru:
~LordKitsumaru May 3, 2008
I am in love with the statement. It seems, nowadays, censorship in itself is becoming an art.

I adore the fact that society widely accepts the mutilation of the body in media, but rejects the body itself. Is it not worse for a child to watch something like Saw then something with even brief nudity?
Reply
:iconmarcie4real:
!marcie4real Feb 7, 2008
I actually think the violation would fall under the DA rule that says that pictures that feature genitals as the main focus can and will be removed.

But.... just a few weeks ago a picture of a chick masturbating was featured as a DD and despite the fact that loads of people complained on it, the person that featured it still stuck up for it and allowed it to remain. So I think whatever's behind that black box is probably tame to say the least. :P
Reply
:iconsagath:
~Sagath Jan 2, 2008
Censorship on DA makes no sense to me. They already make it necessary to be a member to VIEW images and to see the more graphic images settings have to be set to be able to view the material. If some kid comes across the material who gives a flying fuck... Their parents are the ones who should be controlling their internet usage and if their going to look for porn no one is going to turn to DA to find it because this is ART...

bastards...

sorry for the rant and language lol I just can never understand this.
Reply
:icongnulancer:
!GNUlancer Nov 20, 2007   Interface Designer
Violation? Of what? Rabbit's laws?
I don't get it why people on this planet are so keen on laws. Especially on the Net, where everything is so favorable for free socializing. I'm really sick & tired of this.
Reply
:iconillustratedeye:
`IllustratedEye Nov 20, 2007  Professional Photographer
hehe yah i hear yah ><
Reply
:iconemenem:
~Emenem Nov 20, 2007
I hate the Censura ;) please make it without it!
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
Preview   Add Comment
©2013 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Developers | Careers | Site Tour | Help & FAQ Advertise | Premium Membership Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy